home message archive About Musings Graphics Writings Quotable Quotes Professional Blog Twitter Music Unlabeled
next

Disorganized Musings

Aspiring Freelance Writer and author, part time high-school student, full time procrastinator.
hover for description

billie-joe-punx:

So there will probably be a Green Day tour next year!

carpeumbra:

kittengrin:

kittengrin:

carpeumbra:

kittengrin:

carpeumbra:

Fifty Shades of Domestic Abuse

50 Shades of Damaging Stereotypes 

Fifty Shades of Wanna Guess How Many People Will Be Hospitalized Due To Flesh Wounds From Improper Knots After The Movie?

50 Shades of Glorified Abuse

50 Shades of Kidney Damage from Incompetent Crop Use

Fifty Shades of Pathological Violence Due To Past Trauma Isn’t Kink

delicatepoetry:

"The universe means nothing to me without your eyes being the first stars I see."

Anonymous asked:What is 50 shades of grey about? And what's so bad about it?
aconissa replied:

50 Shades of Grey was originally fanfiction based on the Twilight series, which was then published as a novel (along with 2 subsequent books). It sold over 100 million copies around the world and topped best-seller lists everywhere. It’s about to be adapted into a film, set to come out early next year.

It follows a college student named Ana Steele, who enters a relationship with a man named Christian Grey and is then introduced to a bastardised and abusive parody of BDSM culture.

While the book is paraded as erotica, the relationship between Ana and Christian is far from healthy. The core mantra of the BDSM community is “safe, sane and consensual”, and 50 Shades is anything but. None of the rules of BDSM practices (which are put in place to protect those involved) are actually upheld. Christian is controlling, manipulative, abusive, takes complete advantage of Ana, ignores safe-words, ignores consent, keeps her uneducated about the sexual practices they’re taking part in, and a multitude of other terrible things. Their relationship is completely sickening and unhealthy.

Basically, “the book is a glaring glamorisation of violence against women,” as Amy Bonomi so perfectly put it. 

It’s terrible enough that a book like this has been absorbed by people worldwide. Now, we have a film that is expected to be a huge box-office success, and will likely convince countless more young women that it’s okay not to have any autonomy in a relationship, that a man is allowed to control them entirely. It will also show many young men that women are theirs to play with and dominate, thus contributing to antiquated patriarchal values and rape culture.

valeria2067:

middleclassreject:

dysonrules:

REBLOG FOREVER.

Boycott this fucking movie, for the love of god. These kinds of ideas are dangerous and set us back as a society 

Boycott, boycott, boycott. As said above, BDSM is not the problem. It is also not present in 50 Shades. 50 Shades is abuse; it is not BDSM.

I'm not gonna lie to you, it's expensive as hell. But check this out. We told this test subject to just go ahead and try to land on her head.’

(Source: seeyouaroundwolf)

ckate2011:

Daniel Radcliffe, everyone.

(Source: totally-sonic)

raptorific:

Okay so imagine you ask somebody to tell you a riddle. 

They turn to you and they say “the south pole.”

You say “what?”

They just repeat “the south pole!”

So you press them for some sort of explanation. They urge you to figure it out on your own, they say it’ll be better that way. They give you an hour to figure it out.

So you set to trying to figure it out, but every five minutes, they say something like “you still haven’t gotten it? It’s going to be great when you do!” or “but what do I mean by that?” or “don’t forget: the south pole!”

And then, the hour’s up, and you still have no idea what they mean. 

"Okay, are you ready for this?" They ask you. You say yes, and they say:

"Where can I build a house with four walls, all facing north?"

And of course, you reply “the south pole.”

Now, I imagine you’re pretty unsatisfied. You feel like, if you had been given the riddle to begin with, you would have had a lot of fun trying to figure it out

But instead, you were given the answer at the beginning, and it just feels like your friend just spent a full hour enjoying watching you squirm while you tried to figure out what the riddle was

And that’s the problem I have with how Steven Moffat constructs his seasons of Doctor Who

(Source: touchingbutts)

swanjolras:

okay, most of what i do re: harry potter is criticism, and hp is flawed in such a number of ways, but sometimes i just sit here and

i mean, you all have a comprehension of just how drastically harry potter changed literature, yeah? like. it revitalized it. it blew the literary scene apart. the new york times had to create a separate bestseller’s list for children’s lit just because harry potter existed. harry potter changed reading.

so many people on tumblr were born in the ’90s. when the first book came out, most of us couldn’t read. but we grew up in a world where everyone, everyone, everyone was reading harry potter, no matter how old they were; we grew up in a world where the most popular story in the entire world was a fantasy children’s book.

it’s sort of difficult to grasp, sometimes, the extent to which harry potter is not just a book. the extent to which what is basically a series of fun, interesting, and fairly good novels is such an enormous, enormous part of our lives, a cultural touchstone, a truly universal reference point, something so many people have shaped their lives around, a foundation for all of the stories we would read and watch for the rest of our lives— for so many of us, the first books we ever loved

the extent to which so many of us can’t call ourselves “fans” of harry potter, because it would like being a “fan” of, like, having lungs.

it’s not even about liking it or disliking it. it’s just a part of us.

jackwillett:

penguintim:

to-kill-a-moshing-bird:

I’M WATCHING THE DOCTOR WHO SEASON FIVE FINALE AMD IM REALLY ANGRY BC WHAT THE HELL THERE ARE TWO AMELIA PONDS FROM DIFFERENT TIMES IN THE SAME PLACE THIS IS A PARADOX WHY CAN THIS HAPPEN AND THEY CAN TOUCH WHEN ROSE COULDN’T HOLD HER YOUNGER SELF WHEN SHE WAS WITH NINE BC NO IT’S A PARADOX SUPER DANGEROUS I’M??????

YES. Mofat completely ignores the Blinovitch Limitation Effect. He does it again in the next episode (A Christmas Carol.)

What makes it worse is that earlier in the episode when Rory releases the Doctor the two sonic screwdrivers touch and there is a spark [a spark is hardly a fitting paradox but at least it is something]. Then no more than 2 minutes later you have the two Amy’s bullshit where literally nothing happens! If Amy blew up then at least the episode would have been somewhat enjoyable. But this is the massive piss take about Moffat. Getting Doctor Who continuity wrong is one thing, getting his own continuity wrong is another, getting his own continuity wrong WITHIN THE SAME EPISODE IS JUST OFF THE FUCKING CHARTS! To think people call this man a good writer!